|
Overview of
Process
Seattle Public
Schools began a review of math curriculum as part of a strategy to
meet the urgent need to help students master math standards. Like
districts across the nation, Seattle Public Schools student
achievement in math is not keeping pace with improvements in
reading and writing. The intent of the review is to eventually
align and integrate curriculum across all grade levels, which will
provide students with clear building blocks as they move from grade
to grade.
Currently,
for elementary level, there is substantial variability in the
content taught in classrooms, which contributes to the fact that
student performance in mathematics is not at standard. There is
also a lack of coherence (from grade to grade) in the curriculum
and there is too much content taught at each level. Teachers need
and have requested additional mathematics content knowledge, common
curriculum, and central office support. An adoption will enable us
to support a system-wide implementation of a single curriculum with
a common focus.
The
curriculum adoption process for math began in 2005, and started
with a survey of all math teachers in the district. The results
helped us to identify issues related to academic achievement with
reference to instructional materials, instructional focus,
professional development needs and alignment.
During
2005-2006 work was done to evaluate math materials at all grade
levels. A middle school math adoption, CMP2, was approved by the
School Board during 2006 and implemented in fall 2006. Based on
work done during 2006-2007, the board is now considering adoption
of “Everyday Mathematics,” supplemented by Singapore
Math, as the elementary math curriculum.
Other
strategies to improve student achievement in math include
investment in math coaches who work one-on-one with teachers, a
variety of student and family math events at schools, and on-going
training for principals and teacher leaders in the use of data to
guide adjustments in instruction.
Below is the timeline
for our adoption work to the present:
| September 2005 |
Board approval of $1.5 million
to adopt mathematics instructional materials K-12 and add math
coaches |
| October
2005 |
Adoption
committee formed (teachers, coaches, principals, central
administrators). The adoption committee role was to develop
screening criteria and screening tools and to evaluate the various
curriculum materials available. |
| January
2006 |
Adoption
Committee members reach consensus on finalist candidate programs
based on findings from initial screening of all
programs |
| March
2006 |
The decision
is made to lengthen the adoption process for elementary to enable
teachers to screen the revised editions of the finalist candidate
programs – which are expected in winter 2007. |
| May
2006 |
Middle
School Adoption Team selects The Connected Mathematics Project2 to
recommend for implementation beginning 2006 –
2007 |
| |
School Board
approves adoption of CMP2 |
| January
2007 |
Representatives from each
elementary school meet to continue elementary math
adoption. |
| February
– March 2007 |
Materials
placed in all 70 schools for 1 week for teachers and parents to
evaluate |
| April
2007 |
Evaluation
data analyzed and Recommendation made |
| May 8,
2007 |
Recommendation presented to
Student Learning Committee |
| May 14,
2007 |
Introduction
to School Board |
| May 28,
2007 |
School Board
Vote |
The recommendation for Everyday
Math
Criteria that
drove the decision for the recommendation are that Everyday
Math:
- is a
research-based curriculum and a rigorous program
- provides
differentiated activities for a diverse population
- materials
are very deliberate and intentional about giving students
experience with standard efficient algorithms
- materials
help students develop understanding
- materials
include daily review and practice of basic skills
- includes
parent support with homework and building math literacy
- is the only
curriculum listed on the “What Works Clearinghouse”
site that has shown positive results
- supports the
use of technology
- has very
strong alignment with the GLEs, with the WASL and CMP2
- has an
organizational structure that is friendly for teachers and
parents
About Everyday
Math
Everyday Math
is a K-6 program that was developed through National Science
Foundation funding (NSF). The materials develop concepts and skills
over time in a wide variety of contexts. The development of this
program was based on examination of successful curricula from
around the world, research on how children learn mathematics and
the actual use of mathematics by people in their everyday lives. It
provides concrete modeling as a pathway to abstract understanding.
The spiraling approach used in the curricular materials is based on
the premise that students need multiple exposures to concepts over
time. While Everyday Mathematics builds conceptual understanding
and gives students opportunities to communicate their thinking in
writing, it also has a strong and deliberate focus on basic skills
and efficient algorithms.
This program
is used by more districts than any other textbook program in the
United States. Research results show that it has significant impact
on student achievement. Everyday math is recommended as the core
program for implementing mathematics in the elementary grades to be
used during a 60-minute math lesson every day.
About Singapore
Math
Singapore
mathematics is the program used in Singapore. It is famous because
Singapore is the top scoring country on most of the TIMSS
assessments. The curricular materials have been credited with some
of this success. This program has been modified to create a U.S.
edition that uses U.S. measurements and terms.
Singapore’s textbooks
foster deep understanding of mathematical concepts. The focus is on
mathematical thinking with immediate application of new skills to
problem solving. There are only a few topics covered each year, and
these topics are introduced in great detail. In addition,
understanding is enhanced through visual representation utilizing a
problem solving strategy termed, “”model
drawing.” In addition to the 60-minute Everyday math lesson,
up to 15 minutes will be set aside each day to use supplementary
materials to address computational fluency.
Implementation and
Support
The plan for
implementing the new math program will begin in the summer of 2007.
All primary grade school teachers, English Language Development,
Special Education, and Advanced Learning teachers will be required
to participate in two days of initial use training. This initial
use training will provide a curriculum overview, lesson planning
with assessment guidance, strategies for students who are
struggling with math, and homework guidance for supporting parents.
The second phase of the implementation includes training math
coaches and lead teachers who will work with schools to model best
practices, teach upcoming math units, and work in data teams to
analyze results and plan for instruction. A third component will
provide follow-up training sessions that will include a focus on
strengthening understanding of lessons and program components,
differentiation within the curriculum, strategies for strengthening
computational fluency. All principals and district leaders will be
required to attend training to ensure fidelity of
implementation.
Guide and Support for
Parents and Guardians
- Guide for
Parents/Guardians – printed and web-based materials that will
guide families as they support their students in mastering math
standards.
- Family Math
Nights and other events – central office and school coaches
will provide support to schools in hosting events where families
can learn more about the math curriculum and how to help
students.
Balanced
Assessment
On-going
assessments of student proficiency in the concepts covered in class
are a critical component of any curriculum adoption. Everyday math
incorporates many opportunities to conduct ongoing assessments,
e.g. observing students as they work on math box problems, playing
games, sharing problem strategies. Teachers will also use student
journals and portfolios, group projects, reports and end of unit
assessments to measure student progress. Updated May 14,
2007
|