|
Building a
Balanced Budget for 2006-2007
Overview, Budget
Options, and
Frequently Asked
Questions
Updates May
16, 2005
1. The time period for submission of
scenarios via the budget-balancing model has closed, to allow for
analysis and reporting to the School Board. However, the model is
still posted for viewing on this website. To submit suggestions for
budget balancing, please email reshaping@seattleschools.org; with
"Budget Suggestion" in the subject line.
2. A School Board work session
related to budgets is scheduled for Wednesday, May 18, 4:00 to 5:45
p.m. in the Auditorium of the John Stanford Center, 2445 3rd Avenue
South. Topics include an update on closing the 2005-2006 and
2006-2007 budget gaps.
3.
Analysis of benefits or costs of sale of John Stanford Center for
Educational Excellence. Community members have suggested that
selling the John Stanford Center for Educational Excellence and
relocating administrative, maintenance and repair, nutrition
services and warehouse functions to other district-owned buildings
might result in budget savings. An analysis of this suggestion has
been completed by an independent party, a City of Seattle auditor
on-loan to Seattle Public Schools. In summary, the analysis
indicates that selling the Stanford Center would not save money,
but rather would cost the District up to $73 million to renovate
school buildings for administrative and light manufacturing
purposes. Further, these uses might not be permitted as the
principal use in neighborhoods where our schools are
located.
Overview
Seattle Public Schools faces an
estimated $12.2 million budget gap for 2004-2005 and an estimated
$20.7 million gap for 2006-2007. Work continues to balance the
budget for 2004-2005, partially based on the use of reserves, other
one-time funds, and some budget reductions. The Board is scheduled
to vote on a final 2004-2005 budget in July.
With a projected budget gap of $20.7
for 2006-2007, more extensive changes will be necessary. To ensure
the budgets for 2006-2007 and beyond are balanced, the district
must implement a combination of expenditure reduction and revenue
enhancement strategies.
The Superintendent directed that
this process begin early to ensure there is time to make considered
decisions, and because some options need a longer lead time to
implement.
The overall goal of the budget
planning work is twofold:
1. To ensure that
every school is a high quality school, supported by the resources
needed to assist every child to succeed.
2. To create a sustainable budget
that ensures the district lives within its means.
Over the past three years,
significant reductions have been made to the District's budget. In
addition, a large percentage of the budget is driven by mandatory
services or contractual obligations.
Virtually all options that remain
for budget reductions require difficult and painful
choices.
To ensure careful consideration and
planning for the 2006-2007 school year, the Superintendent and
School Board have sought community and staff input into the
planning process.
A budget planning model was prepared
that illustrates some of the options available for revenue
enhancements and expenditure reductions. The interactive model was available for
community submissions through May 15. Suggestions submitted through
this process will be analyzed and presented to school board members
as budget discussions continue. Although the submission cut-off
date has passed, the model is still available for review. Comments
or suggestions on budget-balancing strategies can be made by email
to reshaping@seattleschools.org. Please use "Budget Suggestion" in
the subject line.
Background information about the budget-balancing
model
Links to background data on the district budget,
enrollment, and facility capacity
A list of
frequently asked questions about the model and budget-balancing for
2006/2007
Information on the Budget
Planning Model
This tool provides the ability
to model various budget-balancing scenarios by selecting from a
list of options developed by staff, community and board members.
While submissions via the model are not accepted after May 15, the
model is available for your use.
The model is divided into five
sections, which are described below. As you work through the
sections, the model will calculate the running total of the
savings/revenue enhancements that you have selected. Here's how the
calculation feature works:
Using the model
calculation features
At the top and bottom of the
model form, there is a box that displays the projected 2006-2007
budget gap of $20.7 million. As you make selections throughout the
model, the dollar amounts are deducted from the gap and the
difference is displayed.
At the bottom of the
calculation box there is a feature called "Show Alert Dialog for
Each Selection Made.” If you check this feature, a dialog box
that shows the total amount of gap remaining will pop up after each
selection you make. Use of this function is optional and can be
activated or deactivated as you work through the
model.
You will notice that not all
line items will be deducted from the gap as you select them. These
are options that either cannot be implemented in time to affect the
2006-2007 gap, or items that have not yet been fully analyzed to
determine potential savings.
The budget model for
2006-2007 is divided into five sections:
1. Savings from school
consolidation
- School closure and
consolidation is being considered as one option to reduce overhead
costs and redirect funds to student
services.
- If you wish to include school
consolidation in your budget-balancing scenario, enter the number
of elementary, middle, and high schools to be
closed.
- When these values are entered,
the associated cost savings will be deducted from the $20.7M
gap.
2. Savings from changes to
transportation and/or student assignment
plans
- A number of changes to the
District's transportation and assignment plans have been proposed,
and were discussed in a series of community forums during
February.
- In this section, select one
option only if you feel the District should change from its current
student assignment/transportation plans.
- The list of scenarios,
presentations and data provided at student assignment and
transportation forums are available on our website. You may
wish to review this information before selecting an
option.
- If your budget scenario calls
for no change to assignment/transportation, make no selection in
this section.
3.
Other potential revenue enhancements or expenditure
cuts
- This
section contains a wide
array of options for budget cuts or revenue increases for
2006-2007.
- The list was
compiled from suggestions from staff, board members, and community
members.
- Please note that
inclusion on this list does not imply that the
program or services are not valued or effective. They are merely
options.
- The list is sorted by dollar value
of the saving or revenue increase. Further, the list is not
prioritized nor yet evaluated against the District's academic goals
and objectives.
- You may select as many options from
this list as you wish.
Note that for some options, the
dollar savings or revenue increase is listed as "To be determined,"
or "tbd." These items require further analysis, which is in
progress. Including these options in your choices will not reduce
the gap in the context of this model.
4. Long-term
options
- Long-term options include the ideas
that are likely to take more than one year to implement and
therefore will not contribute to closing the 2006-2007 budget
gap.
Background Data
and Information Resources
Potential School
Consolidation, Student Assignment and Transportation
Plans
Superintendent's
Preliminary Recommendation on School Closure/Consolidation, Student
Assignment and Transportation
April 20,
2005
Presentations
and Data on Enrollment, Facility Capacity, Transportation Plan
Options and Savings
Seattle Public Schools Budget --
2004-2005
General Fund Budget 2004-2005
Flexibility View of Budget for
2004-2005
Seattle Public Schools
Budget -- 2005-2006
The general
fund budget for 2005-2006 will not be finalized nor adopted by the
School Board until July 2005. However, school-based budgets and
transformation plans were submitted to education directors by March
18. The documents used to prepare those budgets are as
follows:
The 2005-2006
Green Book provides overall allocations and budget
instructions.
The 2005-2006
Blue Book contains details by school of funds allocated through the
Weighted Student Formula and selected grants.
Both
documents are available on the Budget
website
Frequently Asked
Questions
Q: How will the choices and
information submitted in each budget-balancing model be
used?
A: District staff will compile, analyze, and present to the
School Board a summary of choices submitted. This information will
inform staff and board members about community preferences as
budget discussions for 2006-2007 continue.
Q: The 2005-2006 budget is
not yet final. Why are you seeking input at this time to the
2006-2007 budget?
A: Essentially, to
stabilize the district financially, to be open and honest with
staff and community about the financial challenge that lies ahead,
and to get early input into planning. The 2005-2006 estimated
budget gap is $12 million. While closing that gap is very
challenging, the Superintendent has recommended strategies that
will balance the budget without making deep cuts to schools. Many
of the strategies are one-time uses of funds. The budget gap for
2006-2007 increases to $20 million. Many of the one-time funds will
not be available to help close that gap, so more fundamental
changes District programs and services will be
essential.
Q: Will budget reduction
decisions be based on the items that are most often included in the
submissions?
A: Not necessarily.
While this input will inform discussion and decisions, it is the
responsibility of the Superintendent and the School Board to make
budget-balancing decisions that are in the best interest of all
children in the district. As the 2006-2007 budget is prepared, the
Board will be guided by its mission, vision, beliefs and values, as
they do with every decision made.
Q: Can I submit more than
one budget-balancing scenario?
A: While you may work
with the model as many times as you wish, only the first response
from each unique email address will be included in the analysis
presented to the Board. This will help ensure that the data
gathered is representative of the diverse opinions represented in
our community.
Q: Why is my service or
program on the list? Does this mean that is is likely to be
eliminated or reduced?
A: The list is
comprised of ideas submitted by staff, leadership team members,
board members, and community members. Inclusion on the list
does NOT imply that the service or program is not
valued. It also does not imply that the service will be
eliminated or reduced. The Superintendent and board members
will carefully consider all budget-balancing options before making
decisions.
Q: Why isn't a particular
service or program on the list? Does that mean it is
exempt?
A: Programs and
services that are legally required, or federally mandated, have not
been included in the list. If you wish to submit an idea for
consideration, simply include it in the "Additional Ideas" section
at the end of the model.
|