|
If
your child participated in the 2007-08 testing cycle and was found
not eligible as a student who is academically gifted or
academically highly gifted, you may appeal the decision. We will
not accept private assessments as the basis of initial eligibility
- all students MUST participate in the district testing
cycle.
You
are responsible for providing information in ALL areas in which
your child failed to meet eligibility criteria AND in those areas
required for an eligibility decision. For example, at the second
and third grade level, cognitive ability AND reading and math
achievement tests are needed for an eligibility decision. If your
child participated in the district's cognitive ability testing, but
the scores did not meet the thresholds necessary to participate in
the achievement portion of the district testing cycle, you would
need to provide (a) cognitive ability information AND (b) reading
and mathematics achievement information in order for the appeal to
be considered complete. Check the chart below to see which tests
are necessary for your child's grade level.
Appeals should be in
writing, should include your child's name and ID number, and
include additional compelling information about your student that
would establish your child's eligibility. This additional
information may include, but is not limited to:
- Additional test results. Testing completed by a qualified, licensed
professional may be submitted for consideration. For families
qualified for the free/reduced lunch program, Seattle Public
Schools will provide in-house testing for appeals. To be
successful, additional test results would need to provide
information in ALL areas in which your child did not meet
thresholds through the district testing process and all areas that
are REQUIRED to determine student eligibility. List of private
providers.

- Written teacher comments that describe how this
student's performance is comparable to peers.
Teacher
comments can be very compelling when they provide data and specific
information about your child's performance. Knowing that your child
is highly motivated and does well in the classroom is important
information but more compelling information would be the inclusion
of specific skill levels in reading and math and the results of any
recent classroom assessments.
- Evidence of classroom work that demonstrates
exceptional achievement. Writing samples, lists of books
read, and examples of problem solving in math can all be compelling
information for the Committee to review.
Mail appeals to: Advanced Learning, MS 32-936, PO Box 34165,
Seattle, WA 98124-1165. We do not accept faxed or e-mailed appeals.
Appeals are due February 13 (or February 6 if your child qualifies
for free/reduced lunch.)
A multidisciplinary Appeals Committee reviews this documentation
to determine your child's eligibility.
There are three common
reasons for appeals not being successful.
Reason 1: The
additional testing information submitted did NOT demonstrate
performance levels in ALL areas needed for program
qualification.
Reason 2: The
evidence that was provided was insufficient to support a decision
change.
Reason 3: No
evidence was provided beyond a cover letter asking to appeal the
original decision, resulting in insufficient information to support
a decision change.
Specific information
concerning the appeal process, timelines, and materials needed are
included in the eligibility letters. These letters will be mailed
on or around January 31, 2008.
Click here for
answers to frequently asked questions concerning
appeals.
The
table below details the information needed at each grade
level.
|
Eligibility
Category
|
Information Needed for an Appeal Decision
|
|
Grades Tested
|
Cognitive
Ability
Testing* |
Cognitive Ability
Testing Criteria |
Reading & Math Achievement Testing**
|
Reading & Math
Achievement Testing Criteria |
| Academically Highly Gifted |
K-7
|
Full scale, verbal,
and performance standard scores on a nationally-normed intelligence
test |
Threshold at the
98/99th percentile |
Broad reading and math standard scores on a
nationally-normed achievement test
|
Threshold at the 95th
percentile |
| Academically
Gifted |
K-1
|
Full scale, verbal,
and performance standard scores on a nationally-normed intelligence
test |
Threshold at the 90th
percentile |
Not needed
|
|
| Academically Gifted |
2-4
|
Full scale, verbal,
and performance standard scores on a nationally-normed intelligence
test |
Threshold of the 87th
percentile |
Broad reading and math standard scores on a
nationally-normed achievement test
|
Threshold of the 87th
percentile |
| Academically
Gifted |
5-7
|
Full scale, verbal,
and performance standard scores on a nationally-normed intelligence
test |
Threshold of the 87th
percentile |
Broad reading and math standard scores on a
nationally-normed achievement test
|
Threshold of the 87th
percentile |
|
*Approved Intelligence
tests include the DAS, the WISC-IV, or the Stanford-Binet V. The
Appeals Committee will consider results from privately administered
intelligence tests that have been completed within the last three
years. For this year's testing cycle, results from cognitive test
administered starting in January 2005 will be
considered.
|
**Approved
standardized achievement tests include the Woodcock-Johnson III
Achievement, Form B, the WIAT-II, and the KTEA-II. Only
achievements tests that have been completed no earlier than April
2007 will be considered.
|
Return to top
Click here to return to AL Home
Page
Updated
01/22/2008
|